Archives For Spirituality

September 27, 2011

Renovaré, the spiritual formation organization, has come out with a book about Christian books, the provocatively titled Twenty Five Books Every Christian Should Read. Gathering together editors from Orthodox, Catholic and Protestant traditions, the list comprises the following books:

1.  On the Incarnation  by St. Athanasius
2.  Confessions  by St. Augustine
3.  The Sayings of the Desert Fathers
4.  The Rule of St. Benedict  by St. Benedict
5.  The Divine Comedy  by Dante Alighieri
6.  The Cloud of Unknowing  by Anonymous
7.  Revelations of Divine Love (Showings)  by Julian of Norwich
8.  The Imitation of Christ  by Thomas à Kempis
9.  The Philokalia
10.  Institutes of the Christian Religion  by John Calvin
11.  The Interior Castle  by St. Teresa of Avila
12.  Dark Night of the Soul  by St. John of the Cross
13.  Pensées  by Blaise Pascal
14.  The Pilgrim’s Progress  by John Bunyan
15.  The Practice of the Presence of God  by Brother Lawrence
16.  A Serious Call to a Devout and Holy Life  by William Law
17.  The Way of a Pilgrim  by Unknown Author
18.  The Brothers Karamazov  by Fyodor Dostoevsky
19.  Orthodoxy  by G. K. Chesterton
20.  The Poetry of Gerard Manley Hopkins
21.  The Cost of Discipleship  by Dietrich Bonhoeffer
22.  A Testament of Devotion  by Thomas R. Kelly
23.  The Seven Storey Mountain  by Thomas Merton
24.  Mere Christianity  by C. S. Lewis
25.  The Return of the Prodigal Son  by Henri J. M. Nouwen

I have read Confessions, Divine Comedy, Institutes, Pilgrim’s Progress, The Way of the Pilgrim, the poetry of Gerard Manley Hopkins and Mere Christianity, which comes out to about 25% of the list. I have On the Incarnation, The Practice of the Presence of God and The Cost of Discipleship sitting on my “book queue” shelf, waiting to be read. Almost all of these books have been on my radar, and I would want to eventually read every one, except for Brothers Karamazov—I just can never really get into Russian writing.

Which of these books have you read? What would you add to the list? Subtract from it?

August 16, 2011

by Lisa Colón Delay

“Prayer of the heart” falls outside of the hurried and hectic ways and mechanisms of the contemporary American lifestyle. It’s foreign culturally. Since it is so uncommon for us, we should pay attention to what we might be missing. We should explore the benefits, and grow by learning lessons from this particular spiritual attitude.

If we think of the heart as the “feeling mind,” rather than, let’s say, gooey sentiment or an emotional mood, we realize the “heart” has everything to do with how we grow and mature spiritually speaking. It’s common Bible knowledge that “God looks at the ‘heart’.” But, we also know this word speaks neither of the blood pumping flesh in our chest cavity, or just some romantic, interior place were Cupid’s arrow has pierced us, and made our eyelashes flutter rapidly. Coupled with our reasoning, the “feeling mind” is the impetus for many, if not most, of the choices we make, whether foolish or faithful. Dallas Willard calls the heart the “control center” or C.E.O. of the mind. It is the place where we make up our minds, if you will.

As this curious part of our being is trained, we come into grater contentment, a righted knowledge of self and our Redeemer, and better worship and adoration of God. A cooperation of our obedience and the Holy Spirit do this work. It’s a process of relieving ourselves of our misguided concepts of control, and willingly letting God’s Spirit change us. I think of what Jesus said… if we save our lives, we lose them; and if we lose ourselves for his sake, we will truly find ourselves completed in God’s righteousness. This holds fast as we take care to desire God. The “loss of self,” of course, is not some reduction of individuality, or a diminution of the psyche, but rather a fulfillment of our potential as humans creations of God’s, fashioned in his image.

For many, a study of the devotional writings of Christians present and past, has served as a powerful guide to this “change of heart”. There are 2,000 years worth of devotional classics to choose from, starting with the Bible, and the early writings of the Christian devout, and coming into present day with the likes of Andrew Murray, Humility & Aboslute Surrender;Dietrich Bonhoeffer,  Life Together; C.S. Lewis,  Letters to Malcolm, many works by A.W. Tozer, and others. These people serve as needed mentors and guides.

One classic stands toward the top of the heap as a favorite among Catholics and Protestants both, over the last 500 plus years. It is among the most translated books ever written, along with John Bunyan’s Pilgrim’s Progress, and Oswald Chambers’ My Utmost for His Highest. (Obviously, none of these works come close to the Bible in abundance of copies or proliferation of translations.) I speak of Thomas á Kempis’ work, written between 1420 and 1427, called The Imitation of Christ.

Decades before Martin Luther and other Reformers attempted to incite reform within the Church, the Holy Spirit’s whisperings were at work, drawing his own to greater devotion and holy living. One such group was the community known as Brethren of the Common Life (or sometimes called The Brothers and Sisters of the Common Life, because it included plenty of women as well). This was a decidedly grassroots movement of (non clergy) laity, and the Church in Rome didn’t know what to do with them. They lived side-by-side, sharing their money and possessions, like the early church in Jerusalem. In devotion to Christ they maintained lives of prayer, work, and community in the bond of the Holy Spirit. They provided for their needs as copyists, reproducing Christian manuscripts by hand, and were led spiritually by the revival and renewal teachings of Dutchman Gerard Groot, more than the Pope. Groot’s primary teachings come forth most powerfully in The Imitation of Christ.

Please enjoy this excerpt:

Had you but once entered into perfect communion with Jesus or tasted a little of His ardent love, you would care nothing at all for your own comfort or discomfort but would rejoice in the reproach you suffer; for love of Him makes a man despise himself.

A man who is a lover of Jesus and of truth, a truly interior man who is free from uncontrolled affections, can turn to God at will and rise above himself to enjoy spiritual peace.

He who tastes life as it really is, not as men say or think it is, is indeed wise with the wisdom of God rather than of men.

He who learns to live the interior life and to take little account of outward things, does not seek special places or times to perform devout exercises. A spiritual man quickly recollects himself because he has never wasted his attention upon externals. No outside work, no business that cannot wait stands in his way. He adjusts himself to things as they happen. He whose disposition is well ordered cares nothing about the strange, perverse behavior of others, for a man is upset and distracted only in proportion as he engrosses himself in externals.

If all were well with you, therefore, and if you were purified from all sin, everything would tend to your good and be to your profit. But because you are as yet neither entirely dead to self nor free from all earthly affection, there is much that often displeases and disturbs you. Nothing so mars and defiles the heart of man as impure attachment to created things. But if you refuse external consolation, you will be able to contemplate heavenly things and often to experience interior joy.

The Imitation of Christ focuses much on renouncing the world–a major concern of their day; as was a very academic perspective toward the things of God. These common religious dispositions lacked a heart’s devotion to God in thought and deed, and The Imitation of Christ attended to that deficit.

Perhaps, to our contemporary sensibilities, The Imitation of Christ goes too far in casting away the world. Our place and time in human history does not correlate directly with their era. Yet, if we set aside, for a moment, our personal tastes, or our exact situations in 21st century America (or elsewhere), and read this work with friendliness toward the community of believers in the time it was written, we will find much treasure there. I encourage you to do just that!

The Imitation of Christ a short work that is available in its entirely, online, in various places. Here is one location: http://www.leaderu.com/cyber/books/imitation/imitation.html I hope you will contact me with your thoughts about this devotional classic. Peace and God blessing, Lisa.

July 13, 2011

It’s high time we recognize the narrowness of contemporary evangelicalism’s definition of “heresy” as a yeast that leavens the whole body and soul with sin and condemnation. If the wrong view on something such as infant baptism, seven literal days of creation or heaven and hell can make someone a heretic in contemporary evangelicalism then the following people are “heretics”:

-James
-Iraneus
-John of Chrysostom
-Origen
-Gregory of Nyssa
-Augustine
-Anselm
-St. Nicholas (“Santa”)
-Thomas Aquinas
-Martin Luther
-John Calvin
-Karl Barth
-George MacDonald
-G.K. Chesterton
-J.R.R. Tolkien
-Dorothy Sayers
-C.S. Lewis
-N.T. Wright

The fact is, I owe my faith to these “heretics.” They have taught me so much about living the gospel and finding salvation and deliverance in this life and the life to come. They taught the people who taught me, and the people who taught them, from generation to generation to generation. I am part of the rich, vibrant faith tradition of Christianity that has been passed on for thousands of years by the people in the list above.

The thought that for thousands of years God has used “heretics” who don’t understand the “gospel” of contemporary evangelicalism to pass down scraps of knowledge that did not redeem them, only so that two thousand years later we are allowed to understand exactly what is in the Scriptures is the worst kind of pride.

June 15, 2011

I love tea. It’s a habitual pleasure. I have a french press on my desk at work so that I can have five or six cups whenever I feel like it. I was craving something sweet one night a week ago, so I went into the kitchen and put on some tea water. I opened the pantry to pull out some sugar and then I saw it: black strap molasses. I thought, that might be good. It wasn’t.

I couldn’t believe I would think of something that was not that tasty (hubris, anyone?), so I googled it and people do indeed drink tea with molasses. But people also drink light beer. Just because people do it doesn’t make it right.

Like tea with molasses, some ideas sound good but end up being not so good. Then what do you do? I think we need to learn from it. When we try something new during a worship service and it doesn’t work out the way we intended, it shouldn’t be relegated to the rubbish heap of bad ideas—we should try to learn from it, to tinker with it, to try and find the goodness in it and refine it until it becomes a meaningful part of our creative lives.

I think I’ll continue to tinker with molasses in tea until I get it right. I hope I can take that mentality and apply it when that prayer doesn’t work quite right, or that advice was a bit flat or that drum fill in a song is a half beat too short.

May 24, 2011

I planted some basil, cilantro and chrysanthemum on my desk at work. Sitting under the neon lights, I have been watering them each day. Last Friday the basil and cilantro sprouted. I just stared at them, waiting for them to open up and get bigger.

Each day they are a little bigger, I think anyways. It’s hard to tell day by day. I know a few weeks from now I’ll walk in and see a full plant and wonder when did this happen?

I think our spiritual life is like that, for better or worse. Sometimes I wake up and wonder when was the last time I prayed? Other times, I relish the brilliance of my collective spiritual life, how everything is connected and deep.

Seeds are planted in our lives. We must take care of them. The trick of it is that there is no easy five step plan. Ten minute quiet times and random spontaneous prayers don’t get you to that when did this happen moment. Gardening, tilling, and cultivating our spiritual lives—that is what gets us to those deep, connected moments of spiritual growth.

 

January 19, 2011

I’ve noticed my life slowing down to a crawl lately. Well, not probably a crawl by any stretch of the means, but a crawl for me. I am reading less and producing less than I did before. I think it’s because we have a three month old…

I’m such a task oriented person that it’s hard to bite the bullet and just be present sometimes. I am enjoying a lot more unscripted, unplanned, free time, which we spend hanging out on the floor playing with toys and listening to music. It’s lots of laughing and talking and spitting up. I am content to pass the winter nights with a cup of tea in one hand, a baby sitting next to me and a leisurely book read…

It’s just that there is a voice in my head telling me that I am not doing enough at a quick enough pace. I tend to read and write at a frenetic pace if given the space—that is my production. Now I am having to learn to tune down the voice in my head telling me to move on from one thing to the next and just be present. It’s the constant call of acedia to a general state of restlessness when I am being called to slow down and be present instead of being a producer.

What are some ways you have found to be more present and less of a producer?

January 17, 2011

The Monastic Cubicle,” my latest article for The Curator Magazine, was just recently published. I explore what the monastic tradition has to say about the dreaded cubicle of corporate America and throw in some literary criticism of Melville’s Bartleby the Scrivener for good measure. An excerpt:

For two years I had been a cubicle dweller. It was a love-hate relationship. Sometimes I could relax, listen to music, and hum away on my computer, working diligently. But however long that lasted, interruption commenced, and suddenly people peered over the walls, walked right into the cubicle, looked over my shoulder. With walls but no doors, the cubicle isolates from sight but not from voice and not from quick observation or interruption. Its qualities of privacy are a facade.

After you’ve read the article you can continue the conversation here in the comments.

October 13, 2010

One of the exercises I have begun to cherish is yoga. After sitting at a desk all day, my back or shoulders may be tight, and the stretches I learned in middle school gym class don’t really cut it. So, when we bought a Wii Fit I started doing the yoga to stretch several times a week and it has helped tremendously with my sore and tight spots, as well as getting me more in tune with how my body is connected.

This unfortunately, in the eyes of Al Mohler, makes me a wishy-washy Christian on a road to pagan-Christian syncretism:

“Christians who practice yoga are embracing, or at minimum flirting with, a spiritual practice that threatens to transform their own spiritual lives into a “post-Christian, spiritually polyglot” reality. Should any Christian willingly risk that?” (The Subtle Body: Should Christians Practice Yoga?

Mohler is saying yoga is unsafe for a Christian’s spirituality, which I find off base for my own yoga exercises, which consist of a video game and a balance board. No chanting. No meditation or emptying of the mind. Just stretching that works better than simply touching your toes and rolling my neck around like I did in gym class.  However, Mohler reminds me that this view of the physicality of yoga is wrong: “There is nothing wrong with physical exercise, and yoga positions in themselves are not the main issue. But these positions are teaching postures with a spiritual purpose.” Mohler, is pointing out that the physical exercise in yoga is spiritual, even when I am just exercising. This point I simply don’t understand. Exercise can be harmful or helpful to our spiritual life, depending on our relationship to our body image and eating habits, but using yoga for exercise in and of itself is not sinful.

There is a gymnasium on the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary campus, where Mohler is president. It consists of various weight machines and benches, as well as saunas, treadmills, free weights and other exercise machines.  This is not a Christian method of exercising. We got all those saunas and free weights from the Greeks and Romans. You know, those pagans who worshiped multiple deities and burned Christians on the stake. Those people. So how can we accept one pagan method of exercise over another? We can’t, and we shouldn’t, for this is exercise. Just as when I lift weights I am not buying into Greco-Roman mystery religions or gnosticism, I am not participating in Hindu religious practice when I do yoga. I am just exercising.

Now some Christian adherents to yoga should take heed to the warning that Mohler gives concerning the spiritual components that may be included in yoga classes. Just as we don’t exercise to purge the body in a gnostic fashion, we should not participate in another religion’s spiritual practices. But, we should not stray from the physical as Mohler suggests. Mohler argues “Christians are not called…to see the human body as a means of connecting to and coming to know the divine.” What Mohler is saying is not Christian Instead, his view of the physical is leaning towards gnosticism. A Christian understanding of the body is that it is the image of God. God formed humanity out of the dust of the earth: very physical stuff. We are connected to God through the combination of our spirituality and physicality—the two cannot be separated. Jesus himself connected to God and knew God through his physical body, and his act of redemption for us was death and resurrection in the flesh. And when Jesus comes again, the kingdom and the resurrection will be both a physical and spiritual reality.

So is yoga safe for Christians? If it is treated as exercise, certainly so. But like anything, if it becomes something that leads us away from the kingdom of God, then it is not good. Turning anything other than Christ’s gospel into a religion is to go astray, and that applies to exercise as well as to shopping, gardening, sex, or work. In reality, what is truly unsafe for the Christian is the dichotomy between physical and spiritual that Mohler espouses, to not allow our physical bodies to participate in the worship of God. Let us pray every day that God not only renews our minds, but that he also establishes the works of our hands, the physical work we accomplish each day with our physical bodies as an act of worship before God, as we look to him who came in the flesh for us.

October 1, 2010

For the past several years I’ve had a rigorous schedule on my day. I was in school for three and a half years, so time was precious, and I found ways to schedule my time down to the minute. Since graduating over a year ago, it’s been a bit disorienting for someone like myself who was used to getting so much done that I feel a bit self-conscious about relaxing some times. It makes me feel guilty to not be “busy.” The lack of schedule has led to some ups and downs in my spiritual and creative life that are different than the ups and downs in a rigorously scheduled life, and I’ve been learning to deal with them.

Instead of busting out a schedule that has everything broken down into 15 minute increments, I’ve decided, with my birthday tomorrow and a kid on the way very soon, that I want something both obtainable enough to accomplish and flexible enough for having a new born. So, no schedule, just goals. I want to accomplish three things every day in a meaningful capacity:

-Lectio Divina and Prayer
-Creative Writing (Poetry & Fiction)
-Exercise

I have plateaued in most of these areas in terms of time spent and growth. I want to spend 20-30 minutes a day doing each, so that I have consistent growth. I’m thinking about getting a day planner and just checking off these accomplishments each day before I go to bed.

Any thoughts on this type of goal setting?

September 27, 2010

There’s a perceived tension in the Christian life about being friends with sinners. We might backslide, we might get into a sticky situation, or we might have our reputations tarnished before other Christians for our unsavory friends. Jesus comes to the rescue for us, thankfully, because he was a “friend of sinners” when the Pharisees, or anyone else, for that matter, would not as much as wave.

I have a problem with this Jesus was a friend of sinners, so you should be one too formulation. The problem is, when you think about it, Jesus being a friend to sinners wasn’t that big of deal for him—it was only a big deal for those on the outside looking in. Anyway, he certainly didn’t have a choice in the matter. Since he was the only sinless guy around, he either had to go off and live out his days as a hermit with no social interaction or be friends with a sinner. Those were the only two options he had.

We are stuck with the same two choices. Since we’re sinners in a whole world of sinners, we can flee to the wilderness and have no friends or decide to stay put and talk to somebody or share a meal with them. That’s all there is to it.  The only safe way to be friends with sinners is to just be friends with them, because you’re one, too.